Eyes Wide Shut
Not many films have managed to annoy me as much as
Stanley Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut!
Eyes Wide Shut is painfully slow, badly acted and
immature. That's a real shame given that it was directed
by the same master film maker who presented Dr
Strangelove, 2001: A Space Odyssey and A Clockwork
Orange; movies that would have to rate highly in a list
of the most innovative and thought provoking.
And what of the merchandising? Eyes Wide Shut is yet
another recent example of the hard sell of a very soft
product, along with Star Bores and Independence Day. It's
a movie sold by subterfuge, a lousy film well promoted.
Here's the process. The film was made and viewed by
the producers. They knew it was a turkey, but knowing
that sex sells, billed it as soft (perhaps even hard
core) porn starring the saleable Tom and Nicole, and
then an added bonus occurred. Kubrick died!
The promoters worked the campaign using a few
seconds of nude action from the stars, drawing patrons
to the cinema with the same techniques used by the
rough spruikers employed by Kings Cross strip joints;
the same rude ruses used to drag drunk, shallow brained
punters off the street to see naked women and "live" sex.
I'm no wowser. Real live sex is great, especially at
home, and even at the cinema. I don't mind sex at the
cinema as it's not too distracting, but Eyes Wide Shut
attempts to elevate sex, even an orgy, into some sort
of stylistic art form.
The sex act, even at its most enjoyable, is also
pretty ridiculous. In real life it might be fun but it's
hardly dignified. At it's best it's an expression of
love or at least a hell of a giggle. As Woody Allen has
said "Sex is dirty. But only if you do it right."
But if ever there was evidence that our culture, and
in this case Hollywood, sometimes takes itself far too
seriously then consider Eyes Wide Shut.
The big thing in Eyes Wide Shut is supposed to be
the orgy but what's this? An orgy I would imagine would
most likely be accompanied by a lot of alcohol, plenty
of laughs and with a bit of luck a good deal of sweat.
I especially think it would be unlikely that an orgy
would be as depicted in Eyes Wide Shut; as a stately
jerk from jerks wearing high heels, masks and bored
facial expressions.
The so called sex in Kubrick's film is sensationalist
Hollywood sex; immature, schoolboy, back of the shelter
shed stuff. I would have hoped this sex wouldn't have
had a hope in a hell of a brothel of selling a ticket at
the cinema. Alas we're not that smart.
Schoolboy? Yes, and as we would expect, very
misogynist and homophobic. There's no male nudity but
one badly taken accusation of homosexuality against
the Tom Cruise character Bill. All of the naked women
are skinny and young. Throw in a camp hotel clerk who's
played for laughs and we have a very biased world indeed.
Most of the above would have been fine though if
the film had been at all entertaining. There have after
all been plenty of worthy films that have been over
promoted, homophobic and sexist, but Eyes Wide Shut is
so slow and awkward it's plain boring.
It's based on a 1926 Viennese novel unsuccessfully
reset to modern New York. Dr Bill Harford and his wife
Alice (Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman) go to a rich
man's (Sydney Pollack's) party where they are both
flirtatious.
Later Alice tells Bill that she has fantasies about
having sex with someone else. This upsets Bill and he,
perhaps for revenge, delves into the seamy, sexy side
of New York.
Bill meets and old friend Nick (Todd Field) who
tells him about these strange orgies and Bill goes to
one of them.
Apparently it's dangerous for Bill to be at the
orgy although it's never really explained why. Bill
later tells Alice, with a ludicrous result. End of
film (thank God!!)
I often think that bad psycho dramas like this
could have worked if they were turned into comedies,
but in this case I think that Kubrick would have also
have had to have got rid of Tom Cruise. Cruise is way
out of his depth here and about as entertaining as a
used condom.
But maybe Kubrick was the real problem because
just about everything about Eyes Wide Shut stinks,
except the sets which are pleasant.
Remember the time travel sequence in 2001: A Space
Odyssey? Well Eyes Wide Shut is almost as bad as 2
hours and 40 minutes of that.
And I really am sick of seeing women peeing on
toilets in movies. We used to see them in the shower
in films. Now it's on the throne. Yuk!!
No Flys At All
|